.
Feedback

Marylanders Rally Against Pit Bull Court Opinion

Protestors argued that pit bulls are being unfairly targeted by the Maryland Court of Appeals.

Annapolis resident Stehle Harris is afraid she won't have a home. 

As the owner of a bull terrier, Harris said the recent that pit bulls and pit bull crossbreeds are dangerous could lead to a slippery slope. The opinion also states that landlords can prohibit the dogs from their properties.

"I think pit bulls capacity to do damage is no greater than a chihuahua," she said. "I'm more apprehensive about smaller dogs."

Harris was one of a group of Marylanders protesting the court's opinion at Lawyer's Mall in Annapolis on Tuesday afternoon. 

Erin Harty, of Baltimore, said Harris' fears aren't unfounded. As a volunteer at Baltimore Animal Rescue and Care Shelter, she said the center is already being overwhelmed with pit bulls as a result of the opinion.

"German shepherds have been targeted, dobermans have been targeted," Harty said. "Pit bulls are the breed du jour"

She added that singling out pit bulls is unwarranted.

"Any dog has the potential to be aggressive if treated unfairly," Harty said.

As a dog groomer for 25 years, White Marsh resident Angela Barnes said she has never been bitten by a pit bull. She owns two rescues of the breed.

"[Pit bulls] are being targeted because people used them in fights," Barnes said. "It all depends on how you treat them."

Kelli Parker, of Fredricksburg, VA, knows this first hand. Before she adopted her pit bull Krush, she said he came from an abusive environment, and was once tied to a outdoor bannister for two weeks. As a result, Parker said Krush was slightly food aggressive when she adopted him.

"With training, he was fine," she said. "He's just very loveable and cuddly."

Parker said the love she receives from Krush and her other pit bull Sasha inspired her to create her own advocacy organization for the breed called The Pretty Chic With The Pits.

"My dogs really did save my life," she said. "They've showed me compassion and unconditional love."

RARE MARYLAND INDEPENDENT May 16, 2012 at 10:38 pm
These people took a day off from work for this?
What a bunch of losers! Eliminate the breed immediately. If one gets loose and hurts some body after the breed was eliminated, the same physical punishment and injuries should be branded on the owner. Problem solved. Next issue
Bernard Lee May 16, 2012 at 10:59 pm
Your rational that identifies blacks in Baltimore as the core of the pit bull problem appears to be very casually arrived at. In the 1830s when dogfighting became popular in Europe and North American blacks were themselves pitted against each other by white slave owners. The pit bull is what he is because of selective aggression breeding by white dog owners. It matters not who owns a pittbull at this point they are genetically maligned and the blacks in Baltimore are not the culprits. Oddly enough bigotry and racism are also a form of selective social breeding. The symtoms are simlar: Unprovoked unsubstantiated attacks against the object of one's stereotypical bias. The legal designation as 'dangerous' is one we would do well to apply with a broader brush.
Buck Harmon May 17, 2012 at 12:15 am
What will be said when there are no more pit bulls.?....................doggone....
This link has repeated itself 5 times it seems..............................doggone...
Barbara Telesmanic May 17, 2012 at 12:55 am
You are severly misinformed and a bigot yourself. There are tens of thousans of wonderful pitbulls and owners...Doctors, nurses, lawyers, blue collar and white collar owners. "Pitbulls", which is not even a breed, but a category which encompassed several breeds and mixes, are no more aggressive than any other dog. All nationally recognized organizations back that FACT...ASPCA, Humane Society of America, American Veterinary Association, National Canine Research Council and many more independent groups. Get a clue and stop the fear and hate.
MikeC May 17, 2012 at 09:47 am
It had to take you quite a bit of searching to find this list, and what makes you think that just because Pitbulls are listed last it was no. 15? I found lots of lists of dangerous dogs, this list was one of the ones with the least information accompanying this list. Amanda, you're not doing very good research here. F! And avoiding the numbers of maimings and killings, man, do those words mean anything to you at all??? Personally, when looking for a dog I'm looking for one that I would have lots of fun with, trust around my children and other folks, and it would be a great companion. I'm not looking for any of these dogs.
South River Parent May 17, 2012 at 10:38 am
My families 3 experiences with pit bulls:
1- my cousins family pet attacked their 5 year old. Bit him in the mouth and tore his cheek loose. Several stitches and rabies shots required. Dog euthanized.. 2 - My daughter's boyfriend had 3 pits. One day the largest attacked my daughter biting and tearing at her head. Ripped part of her hair and scalp off. Big ER bill and several stitches. 3- went to Quiet Waters dog park with our large breed puppy last week. Someone brought a pit. Our dog was just running around in circles and the pit out of now where just attacked our puppy. The pit owners said nothing and acted like it didn't even happen. Simply the facts . On another note it is very disappointing that so many comments on the patch are so racially charged - on both sides. It is sad to believe that my community is so divided and bigotted. I do hold out hope that the common feedback here is representative of only a small sector not all of Davidsonville and Edgewater.
Jo Leonard May 17, 2012 at 03:24 pm
You obviously did not see photos of the people attending the rally all of whom are pit bull owners. Based upon my visual the people there were overwhelmingly white, and I bet middle class. In the Maryland rule, basically muscular dogs with short fur and square heads are affected, pit bull or not. Historically pits have been charged with taking care of children (Victorian England). They were chosen for tv and movie roles as they interact well with kids. The first decorated military dog was a pit bull, and Helen Keller owned them. The pit bull is the only dog to grace the cover of Life Magazine 3 times. It is true that these dogs are used for fighting, but they are also service and military dogs. Prior to 1975 there is only one documented death of a pit bite resulting in a fatality (DBRF). After the pit bull became targe of choice, there were more. According to the CDC, Great Danes, between 1975 and 1980 caused the most DBRF. Since 1975 more than 30 breeds of dogs have caused DBRF including doxies, labs, and a yorkie. You have a greater chance of being killed by lightning or by a falling coconut than being by any dog let alone a pit bull. The greatest corrolation between dog bites and dog types is whether the dog is neutered or not. The corrolation between dog bites and intact dogs is about 96%. I could go on. I am a graduate school educated, employed, rational pit bull owner. I look at facts not media-generated sensationalism.
Jo Leonard May 17, 2012 at 03:30 pm
Mastiffs are actually the dogs used to in Roman pit fights. Not "pit bulls" and the reality is that there is no such breed as a "pit bull terrier". Dogs identified as such are usually a mix and often contain no traditionally regarded aggressive breed mix. In the Maryland court ruling a dog with a square head, short fur is considered a pit bull. My "pit bull" is actually a genetic mix of Corgi, Duck Tolling Retreiver, Labrador Retriever and Beagle, however if you saw her, you would call her a "pit bull" and under the Maryland ruling she is "inherently dangerous".
Jo Leonard May 17, 2012 at 03:32 pm
Because under the ruling, landlords are responsible for the dog too, now. As a result people are being served with eviction notices - get rid of your dog or move. BARCS is now euthanizing dogs, and if you look at the kennel card it read "Maryland Pit Bull Rule". I know of two people are ready to sleep in their cars June 1 because no one wants the liability of their so-called inherently dangerous dogs and they don't want their cherished family pets to die.
Jo Leonard May 17, 2012 at 03:34 pm
Where are you getting your "well documented" statistics? Mine come from the CDC and (Center for Disease Control) which tracks dog bites, maiming and death and their stats do not back you up at all.
Ginger Johnson May 17, 2012 at 04:19 pm
I don't think any of you get it!! It doesn't matter how many rules and regulations are put in place there are still going to be the bad dog owners that train bad dogs. Some of these dogs can and have been rehabilitated BUT if said dog feels threatened or the need to protect it's owner then watch out! Pitbulls are very strong and have a "death" grip, that is the major concern. Yes all dogs bit but not all dogs bit to kill most bit to scare. I have been bitten by a small dog and I still have the scare on my leg from it, dog came out of it's yard while I was walking to my house and bit me for no reason (I was a teenager at the time). I have owned a Pitbull, got him when he was 9 weeks old, one of the best dog I ever had, you could walk right up in my house and he was fine, knock on the door.....then he knew you were a stranger and would bark. Our yard was fenced in, he kept jumping the fence until we got him fixed, fixed that problem and the need to eat my furniture. We had kids that would run their bikes up against our fence and tease my dog. We also had an 8 year old boy in the house, puppy was brought up with him, those two were best friends. At 9 years old my dog went after my 2 year old nephew who was playing on the livingroom floor, unprovoked. It took me a year but i did what I had to do for my family and my dogs best interest after talking with my vet. I didn't want my dog adopted by the wrong person, he was a big strong dog, so I put him down. I couln't risk either
Ginger Johnson May 17, 2012 at 04:28 pm
If you have a wonderful Pitbull that has never bitten anyone never shown signs of aggression then kudos to you, these rules are put in place for everyone but the ones it will affect will be the very people you don't hear speaking up in the blog.....the criminals! We all know the possibilities of aggression a Pitbull has and now if you want to keep them you have to take on that liability. If you have a pool in your back yard you have to add additional home owners insurance because of the liabilty, if you put that pool in without permits you have to pay a fine, if you knowlingly leave your gate open one night and a child drowns....guess what, you are liable. People need to be held accountable that is whats wrong with society these days, everyone wants an exception!!
Tim May 17, 2012 at 04:32 pm
South River Parent: I agree.This community is a microcosm of the entire nation these days.
This nation's population is mentally and emotionally digressing over the past few years - rapidly. As much as we like to deride other countries that are more socially repressed, the irony is that this country has been heading in that direction in recent history. The teapot/kettle argument from other countries population is gaining steam - and quickly.
Mommy23 May 18, 2012 at 06:45 pm
This is just so wrong in every which way!! As stated above by many this breed if raised by responsible owners is one of the most loving, loyal, sweetest dogs. It is wrong for this breed to be discriminated against. All animal owners should be held responsible for thier animal, not just this one breed. Just like If you choose to own a car it does not matter is you have a large SUV(which can cause alot of damage) or a tiny smart car(which would not damage as much) it is the law to carry insurance incase your car causes damage or injury to another. It would make no sense to say only the vehicles that cause alot of harm you need insurance for. If you own it it is your responsibility to drive it safely to try and not have an accident. It is your responsibility as a pet owner to try to prevent incidents w your pets, ALL BREEDS!!!! If I was injured by any amimal large or small, 2 stitches or 200 stitches I would expect the owner to be responsible!!! To say this about one breed is ridiculous and comes from the minds of ppl w no common sense!
Karl Schuub May 18, 2012 at 07:53 pm
Common sense??? If you drive a corvette your insurance is much higher than if you drive a camry. Why do you think that is? Let's call your pit bull a corvette and the lady's beagle down the street a camry. If you want to keep your costs down you're free to buy a camry, but don't expect those that made that more wise camry choice to subsidize the corvette for you. Apparently statistically those that drive corvette's are much more likely to have an accident. Your example lacks exactly what you accuse other of lacking...that would be common sense.
William Lutostanski Jr May 18, 2012 at 09:13 pm
Common sense would say that a corvette is much more expensive then a camry thus the difference in insurance premiums. A corvette in no more likely to get into an accident then a camry. A corvette driver is subject to all the same speed limits and driving laws as camry driver. The driver of the vehicle in either case would be held responsible for any negligence or violation of the law.
By the way Prince Georges County pit bull ban cost over $500,000 to enforce what do you think a state wide ban would cost? http://stopbsl.org/bsloverview/expensive/ This details the cost. Pit bull saves a life ! http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7408004n For your reading pleasure. http://www.humanesociety.org/animals/dogs/facts/statement_dangerous_dogs_breed_specific_legislation.html P.S .... I do not own a pit bull. But I believe in freedom. God Bless.
Karl Schuub May 18, 2012 at 10:55 pm
Price isn't the only driver for insurance premiums...all cars under the "sportscar" category will end up costing you more by way of insurance. Volvos cost more than Corvettes, but the insurance rate for those cars is very, very low by comparison. Why do you think that is? You pitties just don't get it. Go ahead and keep your pit bull; just be ready to pay out some big bucks if it bites somebody...it's not a ban and yet you link to a report that estimates costs for a ban. That's a waste of time...plus a statement from the humane society that has nothing to do with injuries from dog bites but the frequency of bites themselves as if that's a driver of danger to children. You can't with a straight face declare a nippy little yorkie more vicious than a pit bull because they bite your ankles but yet that's what you're trying to get others to believe.
William Lutostanski Jr May 19, 2012 at 12:29 am
Karl, Maybe you have trouble reading. I do not own a pit bull. In fact I don't even like them, I think they are ugly. I linked the ban because most of the posters to these pit bull articles advocate for one. The lowest corvette model starts at $9000 more then the most expensive volvo model, maybe your opinion on cars is as misinformed as your opinion on dogs. The driver of a " sportscar" is held to the same standard as the driver of a pinto.
http://www.avma.org/public_health/dogbite/dogbite.pdf
Karl Schuub May 19, 2012 at 12:39 am
Apparently one of us doesn't read for content and lacks comprehension but it's not me. I never supported a ban...but do support additional financial responsibility and liability for those that choose to keep pets that are statistically proven to be more dangerous. Here's a link to help you understand that yes, typical driving patterns do affect insurance rates and yes, sports car drivers are assumed to drive less responsiblity...indeed someone is misinformed.
"4) High performance and sports cars, like Porches, garner higher car insurance rates because drivers of such vehicles tend to drive at accelerated speeds, causing them to get into more accidents. The rates increase further if drivers are in their 20s." http://voices.yahoo.com/what-kinds-cars-will-increase-car-insurance-2946703.html
John Bender May 19, 2012 at 12:53 am
All you people that "need" dogs just need an emotional crutch in your life. You are week and can't handle normal life without some non-human giving you "love" for giving it dogfood. Wow, how intelligent and weak.
Sam S May 21, 2012 at 12:52 am
Unreal. Idiots that treat dogs like humans. "My poor little pit bull does no wrong!" I wish you pit bull owners could hear yourselves, but since you can't, here's what it sounds like - "A grizzly is not agressive, it's not his fault. It's just the owners fault that didn't feed him enough. If he was feed enough he wouldn't have gutted that 5 year old boy and ripped his limbs off."
Morons. It's because of people like you that you can walk into any randam 7-11 and see a jar for donations to animals filled with 20 dollar bills sitting next to a jar for a paralized kid with drool running down his face filled with about 84 cents.
ESPinCC May 21, 2012 at 01:49 am
Psychopaths: proven to have no empathy for animals. Thanks for the head's up Sam - now we know who to keep an eye on in this community.
Sam S June 6, 2012 at 08:43 pm
I have plenty of empathy for animals. I have 3 of my own. What I don't have empathy for is people that put animals above humans. You are right about one thing though - you should keep an eye on me if you own a pit bull that gets lose and attacks one of my children. That will be the last thing it ever does.
Able Baker June 6, 2012 at 09:52 pm
Please explain to me why owners of any other dog shouldn't be subject to the same liability.
Able Baker June 6, 2012 at 09:55 pm
Dogsbite is run by a lady whose only expertise is that she was bitten by a dog once.
Able Baker June 6, 2012 at 09:56 pm
You're aware that all dogs *do* have to be registered and vaccinated on an annual basis, right? Most people just choose not to do it, and the government isn't interested in making people comply.
Able Baker June 6, 2012 at 10:01 pm
Volvos cost more than Corvettes? What planet do you live on? The lowest end Corvette retails for about twice that of a Volvo.
Able Baker June 6, 2012 at 10:09 pm
Ugh, false dilemma. "No one can care about anything until this important issue that I care about is solved". How many people could have a hot meal or health care with the money you spend on your pets? People priortize plenty of things over other people. Every time you make a purchase that isn't food or shelter you're putting personal comfort over some more worthy cause.
Able Baker June 6, 2012 at 10:33 pm
You do realize that yahoo voices is basically a blog where anyone can post an "article". The rest of the articles that particular author has written are Dancing With the Stars recaps. But hey, you seem to be a fan of bad information, so knock yourself out.
Jeanne August 3, 2012 at 11:05 pm
This is a fact: Pit Bulls can be nasty if encouraged but raised in a good home and treated well, have food and dry safe place to live, Pit Bulls are a wonderful dog. ALL dogs can attack if given incouragement. I have a Lab and if someone comes after me he knows to protect me. When we go out and there is a stranger that is acting funny my Lab will only walk between me and the stranger, my neighbor's Pit Bull is the same way. They are also the same in that if the stranger approaches and is agressive they growl and bark and if that didn't work they would protect their owner. It is not the breed that is bad it is the owner neglecting the dog or raising it to fight. Any breed can fight treated bad enough, any breed can attack. ALL breeds of dogs are good. My lab plays with several differnt breeds of dogs twice a week and loves it, the people that work there have fun with the dogs and love them.
Go after the bad PEOPLE, of all races, not the animals.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Annapolis Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something