.

Tensions Rise in County, Schools Debate Over ‘Unpaid’ $5 Million

Council members say the school system went back on their deal in May to resolve the missing $5 million to meet the maintenance of effort requirement.

Tempers flared in the Anne Arundel County Council’s chambers on Monday when council members sparred with a school official over a $5 million bill they thought was already paid.

The state Board of Education sent county officials a letter in August saying they still owed the school system $5 million to meet the minimum state-required payment to schools, also known as the maintenance of effort.

The news came as a shock to council members, who said they thought the issue of maintenance of effort had been squared away during budget discussions in May.

The solution to the missing $5 million at the time was to pull the needed money from the school system’s projects fund. It was one of several compromises made to balance the budget. Anne Arundel Community College officials also had to pull from the college’s funds to balance their budget.

But the state board—and now the school board—are saying that solution isn’t adequate. In a letter to the county dated Aug. 28, the state Board of Education called the county’s remedy “double-counting.”

After that letter, the county had 60 days to resolve the $5 million hole, with a looming deadline of Oct. 26.

The county’s Chief Administrative Officer John Hammond said the county could pull from its own fund balance, but some funds have been earmarked to resolve overtime payments for the county's fire department. Instead, he endorsed a proposed bill, which would reinforce the agreement reached in May. But he said it was a solution that would only work if the school system acquiesced to it. 

On Monday night, School system’s Chief Operating Officer Alex Szachnowicz made it clear that the county Board of Education does not endorse the bill. However, he said school officials are available to discuss other solutions.

County Council members didn’t take that news lightly.

Councilman Jamie Benoit (D-4th District), of Crownsville, said the board had “unnecessarily politicized education” in the county, and said rejecting this bill would have consequences.

“I'm guessing that since you won’t acquiesce, we will find $5 million, but it'll probably be the last $5 million the Board of Ed gets in a long time,” Benoit said. “I hope you all are ready to explain to the students why this thing is happening this year, the year after, and the year after that.”

Councilman John Grasso (R-2nd District) said he would lead a charge during the next budget year to inflict consequences on the school system.

"If you folks don't come up and man up to your agreement, there's going to be some serious consequences the next budget around, and I can bet you for sure that I'll be the one leading the charge on that," Grasso said.

Council Chairman Derek Fink asked Szachnowicz why the school system didn’t simply pull from their fund balance to cover the missing $5 million. Fink said Anne Arundel Community College pulled from its fund balance during budget season to help balance the budget, which Fink said “helped us out.”

Szachnowicz replied that there were a number of concerns he had with the bill, but Fink interrupted him.

“I don’t see how we could pass this and start working together,” Fink said.

After the meeting, school system spokesman Bob Mosier said school officials want to find a solution that agrees with the newly revised maintenance of effort laws. He said regardless of what was discussed in May, the state Board of Education is the judge of what is an adequate solution.

“We are more than willing to have a discussion so we can get to a place that meets the law as it’s constructed,” Mosier said. “There is zero desire on the part of the school system to fan any flames, or engage in political theater.”

The county council voted to hold Bill 77-11 until the next meeting, scheduled for Oct. 15—just 11 days before the deadline set by the state to find a solution.

Edward Charles October 03, 2012 at 02:20 PM
The BOE is highly skilled at playing on tax payers emotions. "It's for the children." How many times have we heard that, yet the behavior of the BOE arrogantly ignores their responsibility to act in a manner best "for the children". Layoffs at the non-classroom positions are the only way to change the bad behavior and get the results needed "for the children".
Mike October 03, 2012 at 03:44 PM
I bet we could get results as good or better than currently do with cuts of one-third to one-half of the overall school budget. Want to see your tax dollars flushed? Go out on Riva Rd and drive around the HUGE Board of Ed parking lot. Precious few of those folks are doing anything NEEDED to support the education in the classroom. We could nuke the board of Ed almost entirely, cut the budget massively, and probably still give the teachers a raise.
Midge October 03, 2012 at 03:46 PM
And you are now finding out, 30 years later, that your money hasn't gone where it was supposed to go? This 'whining form this County Council and Leopold' as you put it, ... this has been a problem from the Governors office on down. Our transportation money, the Lotto money, taxes, Bay Cleanup funds --- NONE of it is going where you and I have thought it was going. And this has been going on for longer than the current county council has been in place. They haven't been here for 30 years, but our state delegates and senators have been. When you vote for them, you buy this whole thing. Lock, stock and barrel. You voted them in. You failed to protect our children.
Amy Leahy October 07, 2012 at 04:28 PM
Yay Midge! I like what you say. You have hit the nail right on the head. The monetary battles between the county council (and county executive) and the board of education has been going on since the 1960's when charter government was formed. We have no elected school board with separate taxing authority which would solve the backbiting between these two entities once and for all. County government sees the board of education as leeches and the board has to continually beg for money "for the children". Then of course once they get the money the BOE spends it however it wants. Complete with outrageous salary increases for the superintendent. Now our state legislature jumps into the foray by making laws that affect county governments with the 'maintenance of effort' law and more recently allowing county councils to override tax-payer-voted tax increase ceilings to support boards of education MOE. (Hope that makes sense.) All we do is allow this finger pointing and posturing to continue by not having an elected school board. We all suffer.
My Opinion October 07, 2012 at 08:34 PM
Truer words have never been spoken! Mr. Benoit AND the County Council are simply in a power struggle and want to control everything including how much a person receives when they win their case against the County...shame on them but they do not care about us just their power....and so it goes!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »